Rise of the robots and the future of war

Author: 
Jon Cartwright
Publisher: 
Guardian.co.uk

With the RAF and the Pentagon pouring huge sums into robotics, Jon Cartwright asks how this could change warfare and what ethical and legal challenges will follow,

Faced with an enemy fighter jet, there's one sensible thing a military drone should do: split. But in December 2002, caught in the crosshairs of an Iraqi MiG, an unmanned US Predator was instructed to stay put. The MiG fired, the Predator fired back and the result, unhappily for the US, was a heap of drone parts on the southern Iraqi desert.

This incident is often regarded as the first dogfight between a drone, properly known as an unmanned aerial vehicle or UAV, and a conventional, manned fighter. Yet in a way, the Predator hardly stood a chance. American and British UAVs are operated remotely by pilots sitting thousands of miles away on US turf, so manoeuvres are hobbled by signal delays of a quarter-second or more. This means evading missiles will always be nigh-on impossible – unless the UAVs pilot themselves.

In July this year, amid a haze of dry ice and revolving spotlights at the Warton aerodrome, Lancashire, BAE Systems launched a prototype UAV that might do just that. With a development cost of more than £140m, the alien-looking Taranis was billed by the Ministry of Defence as a "fully autonomous" craft that can fly deep into enemy territory to collect intelligence, drop bombs and "defend itself against manned and other unmanned enemy aircraft".Lord Drayson, minister for defence procurement from 2005-2007, said Taranis would have "almost no need for operator input."

Read full article HERE

No votes yet